Publication Ethics

The United Journals abides by the moral matters and would additionally conduct a legal review if needed. The journal ensures publication or advertising does not influence the choices of editors. The Editorial Board of the journal permits you to speak with alternative publishers, journals, and authors for the asking for affiliation.

Authors’ Responsibilities

An author is expected to contribute realistically. He/she must not embody identical analysis in one manuscript for a primary publication. The reported scope of labour has to be supported by necessary citation from the influencing publications. Any conflict in monetary or personal interest that might be in the manuscript, together with the small print of economic support and its sources, must be revealed.

Reviewers’ Responsibilities

The review process helps an editor to make a decision on an article and also enables the author to improve the manuscript and hence a reviewer’s work is of paramount importance. Therefore, the tutorial advancement of scientists is supported through peer-reviewed publications.

Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers

Confidentiality: Reviewers’ comments must be kept confidential. Manuscripts or copies of the method must be preserved with the reviewers once the process is completed.

Constructive Evaluation: The evaluation should be constructive that gives a positive insight to the author with no disputation or inefficiencies with the review process.

Competence: Reviewer with relevant experience must be allotted to review. Individuals lacking adequate experience must be responsible enough to decline the review.

Impartiality and Integrity: Reviewer’s evaluation must solely rely on scientific advantage, subject coherency, the scope of the journal rather on monetary, racial, gender or ethnic origin of the authors.

Timeliness and Responsiveness: Reviewer is accountable to finish the review within the stipulated time and may take all necessary steps to fulfil the restrictions of the journal.

Responsibilities of the Editor and Editorial Board

Publication calls: The editorial board of the United Journal decides whether a submitted article will get published or not. An editor must abide by modern rules bearing on libel, infringement and plagiarism that are necessary. He/she is entitled to take a decision after consultation with reviewers or members of the editorial board.

Fair play: An editor must analyse manuscripts based on his or her intellectual content with race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors playing no part.

Confidentiality: The editors should not share any details of the submitted manuscript with anyone apart from the corresponding writers, reviewers, potential reviewers, alternative editorial advisers, and therefore the publisher, as applicable.


General duties and responsibilities of the editor:

  1. Actively request the views of authors, readers, reviewers and editorial board members with respect to bettering the journals’ processes.
  2. Encourage analysis into peer review and revaluate journal processes in the light of recent findings.
  3. Support initiatives designed to cut back tutorial misconduct.
  4. Support initiatives to coach researchers concerning publication ethics.
  5. Analyse the results of their journal policies on author and reviewer behaviour and revise policies to encourage accountable behaviour and discourage misconduct.
  6. Ensure that any press release issued by the journal mirrors the message of the reportable article and place it into context.

 1 Relations with readers

  • Ensure that revealed reports of analysis are reviewed by appropriately qualified reviewers.
  • Ensure that non-peer-reviewed sections of their journal are clearly known.
  • Adopt processes that encourage accuracy, completeness, and clarity of analysis coverage.
  • Consider developing a transparency policy to encourage most speech and act concerning the root of non-researched articles.
  • Adopt authorship systems that promote sensible observe (i.e. in order that listings accurately reflect who did the work) and discourage misconduct.
  • Inform readers the steps taken to confirm that submissions from members of the journals workers or editorial board receive objective and unbiased evaluation.

2 Relations with authors

  • Publish clear directions in their journals about submission and what they expect from others.
  • Provide steering concerning the standards for authorship and/or who ought to be listed as a contributor.
  • Review author directions often and supply links to relevant tips (e.g. COPE).
  • Require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests are unconcealed once publication.
  • Ensure that applicable reviewers are elite from submissions (i.e. people who are ready to decide the work and are free from disabling competitive interests).
  • Respect requests from authors that a person mustn’t review their submission if these are well-reasoned.
  • Abide by the COPE flowcharts in cases of suspected misconduct or controversial authorship.
  • Publish details of how they handle cases of suspected misconduct (e.g. with links to the COPE flowcharts).

 3 Editors, the referee method, and relations with reviewers

  • Editors should suggest latest and relevant tips with reviewers.
  • Editors should attempt to protect peer reviewers’ identities.
  • Editors should make sure that material submitted to their journal remains confidential until the review is completed.

 4 In Relations with editorial board members

Identify adequately qualified editorial board members who will actively contribute and participate in proper management of the journal. Appoint editorial board members for a set term (e.g. 3 years). Throw light on expected functions and duties of the editorial board members concerning; which might include:

  • acting as representative of the journal
  • supporting and promoting the journal
  • seeking out the most effective authors and actively encouraging the best work (e.g. from meeting abstracts)


  • Evaluating submissions to the journal.
  • Receiving commissions to jot down editorials, reviews, and commentaries on papers of their concerned field.
  • Attending and contributing to editorial board meetings.
  • Consult with other editorial board members often (at least once a year) to understand their opinions concerning the management of the journal, intimate them of any changes concerning journal policies or to deal with future challenges.

5 Relationship with publishers, owners, and advertisers

The relationship of editors with publishers and owners is commonly complicated and is primarily based on the principle of editorial independence. However, this may not be necessarily in every case. Irrespective of the economic and political realities of their journals, editors should make choices on quality articles and maintain similar standards for readers instead of immediate monetary or political gain. Editors must also have declared policies on advertising about the content of the journal and processes for publication supplements.

Conflict of interest

Editors must have a working mechanism for managing the conflicts of interest between themselves, their workers, authors and reviewers. Readers must be informed about who has funded the analysis and on the role of the funders within the research.

Guidelines for retracting articles

United Journals takes responsibility to maintain the integrity of the detailed record of our content for all finish users judiciously. United Journals gives prime importance to the authority of articles once they need to be revealed and our policy is decided on the tutorial publication community. It could be a general principle of studious communication that the editor of a learned journal is exclusive to or chargeable for deciding whether articles submitted to the journal shall be made public. In taking this decision, the editor follows the policies of the journal’s editorial board and is restricted by legal requirements such as that of libel, infringement, and plagiarism. The outcome of this principle is the studious archive as a permanent, historic record of the transactions of scholarship. Articles that are revealed shall stay precise and unreduced in a way as is feasible. However, sometimes unfortunate circumstances might arise where a writing is revealed that must later be taken back or even removed. Such actions should not be taken lightly and might solely occur under exceptional circumstances, such as:

  • Article Withdrawal: Articles in Press that represent early versions of articles and typically contain factual errors, or might be accidentally submitted twice.
  • Article Retraction: In a rare occurrence, the articles might represent infringements of skilled moral codes, multiple submission, false claims of authorship, plagiarism, erroneous use of information or sort. Sometimes a retraction is necessary to correct errors in submission or publication.
  • Article Removal: Legal limitations upon the publisher, copyright holder or author(s) can lead to removal of article.
  • Article Replacement: An article will have to be replaced upon identification of false or inaccurate information that, if not acted upon, could result in a significant fiasco.

Maintaining the integrity of the educational record

Encouraging academic integrity

  • Request proof of moral analysis approval for all relevant submissions and be ready to question authors concerning aspects regarding how patient consent was obtained or what means were employed to reduce animal suffering.
  • Make sure that reports of clinical trials cite compliance with the Declaration of Port, sensible Clinical observe and alternative relevant tips to safeguard participants.
  • Ensure that reports of experiments on, or studies of, animals cite compliance with the U.S.A. Department of Health and Human Services Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals or alternative relevant tips.
  • A journal ethics committee may be appointed to advise on special cases and review journal policies frequently.

Ensuring the integrity of the educational record

  • Ensure all hidden redundant publication are revealed, for example by asking all clinical trials to be registered.
  • Enforce means to firmly archive revealed material (e.g. Via on-line permanent repositories, reminiscent of PubMed Central).
  • Have systems in place to grant authors the option to form original analysis articles freely.

 Preclude business wants from compromising intellectual and moral standards.

Errors, inaccurate or deceptive statements should be corrected promptly as per their importance. Editors must follow the COPE guidelines on retractions.

Submit Manuscript

Manuscript Details

Author Details